Synapse
Trust what you ship with review grounded in your requirements
Review AI-written code against your spec and team rules.
Review every change in context
Combine code analysis and AI review, with evidence behind each finding.
Know why a change was flagged
See the code, requirement, and verification status behind each finding.
Set your review threshold
Choose which issues block approval. The decision and its rationale stay with the change.
Check changes before review
Run the same review from your terminal before asking a teammate to look.
Review related changes together
Review the whole feature together, even when it spans repositories.
- Group related changesChanges for the same specification appear together in the review queue.
- See downstream impactDependencies show which services may be affected and what to review first.
- Keep review ownership clearClaim a related set of changes so teammates know who is reviewing it.
Spot breaking changes across services
See which services a change could break before you release it.
- Map service dependenciesTrace imports and API contracts across repositories.
- Check API compatibilityFind changed parameters and removed fields before release.
- Review before releaseSurface compatibility risks while the change is still in review.
Turn repeated feedback into team rules
Spend less time repeating review comments. Turn recurring feedback into rules your team approves.
- Learn from review feedbackRepeated corrections can become a rule proposal for your team.
- Your team stays in controlRules take effect only after an admin or code owner approves them.
- See why each rule existsRules link back to the reviews and findings that inspired them.
- Keep rules with your codeKeep team rules readable and easy to review.
Find gaps before your team reviews
Check changes against requirements and team rules before sharing them for review.
- Choose the review depthRun a quick check or a deeper review from your shell.
- Consistent checksUse the same review passes locally and in your pull request workflow.
- Resolve issues soonerAddress findings before your teammates begin review.
Findings you can act on
Each finding connects the code, requirement, and suggested next step.
See the relevant code
Go straight to the code behind the issue.
Tie findings to requirements
See which requirement the change does not meet.
Move from finding to fix
Use the code context and repair guidance to address the issue.
From review to a confident decision
The same review process runs locally and on pull requests.
- 01
Read the change
Check the change against requirements and approved team rules.
- 02
Verify findings
Potential issues are checked against the change before they are reported.
- 03
Record the decision
The review, findings, and approval decision stay in the audit history.